The National Center for Health Research conducts, analyzes, and explains the latest research and works with patients, consumers, and opinion leaders to use that information to improve their own health and to develop better programs, policies, and services.
- We conduct research that has the potential to improve health care.
- We translate research findings into free information and training that can be used to improve health and safety to individuals and communities nationwide.
- We work with the media to help get the word out to those who will most benefit from it.
- We educate policy makers, policy analysts, and opinion leaders through briefings, hearings, meetings, and written materials based on the information.
- We share our publications and information with other organizations, researchers, and advocates.
- We coordinate and strategize with them, working together to inform the public and be part of the public debate on policy issues.
- We use that information effectively to improve the health of adults and children.
News You Can Use
The new Netflix documentary, The Bleeding Edge, will help you understand why we have been focused on improving the safety of medical devices since we were founded in 1999.
Statement of Dr. Diana Zuckerman, President of the National Center for Health Research
When I am a guest lecturer on the FDA approval process to audiences of students, doctors, patients, and consumers, they are always shocked to hear that FDA rarely requires clinical trials on medical devices to prove they are safe or effective. The Bleeding Edge provides very compelling examples of how FDA’s unbelievably low standards for devices can have devastating consequences for patients. It will be an important wake-up call for physicians, patients, and hopefully for Congress, as they respond to the concerns of their constituents. The message of this film isn’t about specific products – the message is that none of us can feel confident about our medical care until the FDA requires evidence of safety and effectiveness for all medical devices.
As a scientist, I am very glad that the film is aimed at a broad audience, because everyone should care about the safety of medical products. Of course, a film for a general audience will inevitably simplify some complicated issues. One issue of concern to me is the part of the film where I say that there is a revolving door between the FDA and the industries it regulates. I am very concerned about that, but want to make it clear that I was not talking about previous FDA Commissioners. I was referring to the officials who have headed up the Center for Devices (CDRH), many of whom went to work for industry after leaving the FDA. And, unfortunately, there is also a revolving door for other high level FDA officials as well as some FDA scientists. While several former FDA Commissioners have close ties to industry, many do not.
To read the rest and see the trailer, click here.