Comments on Proposed Order Regarding Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator Devices

May 6, 2013. As members of the Patient, Consumer, and Public Health Coalition, we strongly support the FDA requiring the premarket approval (PMA) process for cranial electrotherapy stimulator devices because they pose substantial risks and the benefits of these devices are “unknown” and there is “limited scientific evidence” regarding their effectiveness.

Read More »

Comments on Proposed Order Regarding Sorbent Hemoperfusion Devices

May 6, 2013. As members of the Patient, Consumer, and Public Health Coalition, we strongly support the FDA requiring the premarket approval (PMA) process for sorbent hemoperfusion devices because they pose substantial risks and the benefits of these devices are “unknown” and there is “limited scientific evidence” regarding their effectiveness.[1] We strongly oppose down- classifying the devices for the treatment of poisoning and drug overdose.

Read More »

Comments on Effective Date for Premarket Approval for Three Class III Devices; Reclassification of Sorbent Hemoperfusion Devices for the Treatment of Poisoning and Drug Overdose

May 6, 2013. As members of the Patient, Consumer, and Public Health Coalition, we strongly support the FDA requiring the premarket approval (PMA) process for the three preamendment devices referred to in this docket because they pose substantial risks and the benefits of these devices are “unknown” and there is “limited scientific evidence” regarding their effectiveness.

Read More »

NCHR Comments on Proposed Order Regarding Transilluminator for Breast Evaluation

May 6, 2013. As members of the Patient, Consumer, and Public Health Coalition, we strongly support the FDA requiring the premarket approval (PMA) process for Transilluminator for breast evaluation devices because they pose substantial risks and the benefits of these devices are “unknown” and there is “limited scientific evidence” regarding their effectiveness.

Read More »