| |
|
|
Emergency Contraception & Sexual Assault: Why Compassionate Care Should be a Standard of Care
| By Sandra Serna Smith |
September 2006 |
The Compassionate Assistance for Rape Emergencies (CARE) Act
(HR.2928/S.1264) and the Prevention First Act (HR.1709/S.20) were
introduced in Congress in 2005. The sole purpose of the CARE Act,
and one of several goals of the Prevention First Act would be
to direct hospitals and emergency medicine facilities that receive
federal funding to inform all women who have been sexually assaulted
about emergency contraception (also known as the "morning after
pill" or "Plan B") and to make it available to them, regardless
of their ability to pay.
The idea behind this legislation is not radical. In fact, it is
supported by the nation's leading medical organizations, including
the American Medical Association, the American College of Emergency
Physicians,
1 the American College of Obstetrics
and Gynecologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics, 2
and the American Public Health Association. It is needed because
many hospital emergency departments don't talk about EC with assault
victims, and neither dispense it nor provide prescriptions to
obtain it at outside pharmacies.3
Unfortunately, no action has been taken on either bill because
neither has received much support from Republicans in Congress.
Once EC becomes available over-the-counter in US pharmacies (which
is expected by the end of 2006) it will still be important to
educate women who have been raped about this option to prevent
pregnancy.
What is Emergency Contraception?
Emergency contraception, also known as the "morning after" pill,
contains the same active ingredients as regular oral birth control
medications, but in higher concentrations. EC has been determined
by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be safe for preventing
pregnancy, and is most effective when taken within 72 hours after
unprotected sex.4 Possible side effects
- which include nausea, vomiting, and spotting - are relatively
mild. EC does not induce abortion, because it will not terminate
an already established pregnancy. It is believed that it prevents
pregnancy by preventing the egg from leaving the ovary; by preventing
the sperm from joining the egg; or by preventing a fertilized
egg from attaching to the uterus.
EC and Sexual Assault Victims
Almost two-thirds of all rapes are committed by individuals who
are known by the victim, with 70% of these individuals being either
an acquaintance or a friend of the victim.5
Approximately 57% of all acquaintance rapes occur while on a date.6
Dates and other social settings of acquaintance rape, like parties,
typically occur at night or on the weekends, when the only medical
facility available to a victim for treatment is the hospital emergency
room.
One study, based on data from the National Hospital Ambulatory
Medical Care Survey from 1992 to 1998, found that less than half
of all women who went for treatment for sexual assault and who
were considered to be at risk for pregnancy (that is, they were
not already sterilized, pregnant, or currently taking regular
oral contraceptives) received EC.7
A national telephone survey using a "mystery client" approach
in which researchers pose as women simply inquiring about the
availability of EC in 597 Catholic hospitals and 615 non-Catholic
hospitals, found that 55% and 42%, respectively, do not dispense
EC, even in cases of sexual assault.8
State Laws
In the absence of federal legislation, a few states have tried
to amend this unfortunate situation with laws that require their
state's hospital emergency departments to inform assault victims
about EC or to dispense EC to assault victims when they request
it, or both.9 It is unclear whether
these laws have corrected the problem.
One study looked at the availability of EC in Catholic hospitals
in Washington, New York, California, and South Carolina, after
these states passed legislation that either directly or indirectly
mandated that EC be provided to sexual assault victims.10
Based on a survey administered to sexual assault nurse examiners
regarding their hospitals' written policies on providing EC to
rape victims and a "mystery client" approach, the researchers
found that there is still room for improvement. While most of
the hospitals' policies appeared to comply with their local
EC laws, 35% of the hospitals informed a "mystery client" caller
that they do not provide EC, regardless of a patient's circumstance,
and 38% of the hospitals surveyed indicated that they do not treat
sexual assault patients.
Federal Legislation is Still Needed
Legislation to ensure that women who are raped can have access
to EC - regardless of where they live and what hospital cares
for them - is desperately needed. The odds that the current proposals
will gain momentum before this congressional session is over are
very slim, but it is important that the public, along with public
health professionals and sexual assault advocates, continue to
let lawmakers know how important this issue is.
Women can't afford to be kept waiting for this legislation. Sadly,
approximately 5% of all rape victims, ages 12 through 45, will
become pregnant as a result of their attack. This translates into
roughly 25,000 to 32,000 pregnancies each year. It is estimated
that wider knowledge about and availability of EC could reduce
that by as much as 89%.11, 12
Those victims of sexual assault who summon the courage to go to
a medical facility to receive treatment deserve the utmost compassion
and respect. Just as they deserve to be fully informed about treatment
options to prevent sexually transmitted infections, they deserve
the opportunity to prevent the occurrence of unwanted pregnancy.
______________________________________
1. American College of Emergency Physicians.
(2002, October). Management of the Patient with the Complaint
of Sexual Assault. Retrieved on August 2, 2006 from: http://www.acep.org
2. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2001). Care
of the adolescent sexual assault victim. Pediatrics, 107(6),
1476-1479.
3. Rosenberg, K. D., DeMunter, J. K., & Liu, J.
(2005). Emergency contraception in emergency departments in Oregon,
2003. American Journal of Public Health, 95(8), 1453-1457.
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Office on Women’s Health. (2006, May). Emergency Contraception:
Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved on August 10, 2006 from: http://www.4woman.gov/faq/econtracep.htm
5. Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. (2006).
Facts about Rape. Retrieved on August 10, 2006 from: http://www.rainn.org/statistics/index.html
6. Rape Crisis Volunteers of Cumberland County.
(2000). Date Rape. Retrieved on August 10, 2006 from: http://www.rapecrisisonline.com/DateRape.htm
7. Amey, A. L. & Bishai, D. (2002). Measuring the
quality of medical care for women who experience sexual assault
with data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39(6), 631-638.
8. Harrison, T. (2005). Availability of emergency
contraception: A survey of hospital emergency department staff.
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 46(2), 105-110.
9. Guttmacher Institute. (2006, August 1). State
Policies in Brief: Emergency Contraception. Retrieved on August
7, 2006 from: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_EC.pdf
10. Catholics for a Free Choice. (2006, January).
Complying with the Law? How Catholic hospitals respond to state
laws mandating the provision of emergency contraception to sexual
assault patients, A study conducted by Ibis Reproductive Health
for Catholics for a Free Choice. Washington, DC: Catholics
for a Free Choice.
11. Holmes, M. M., Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick,
D. G., & Best, C. L. (1996). Rape-related pregnancy: Estimates and
descriptive characteristics from a national sample of women. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175(2), 320-325.
12. Stewart, F. H. & Trussell, J. (2000). Prevention
of pregnancy resulting from rape: A neglected preventative health
measure. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(4),
228-229.
|
|
|