Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical used to make plastics. It is frequently used in sports equipment, water bottles, medical devices, as a coating or lining in food and beverage cans, and in credit card receipts. It leaches out of plastic into liquids and foods, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found measurable amounts of BPA in the bodies of 93% of the U.S.population studied.
Infants and children are estimated to have the highest daily intake of BPA because “they eat, drink, and breathe more than adults on a pound for pound basis,” according to the U.S. National Toxicology Program. Until a few years ago, most plastic baby bottles contained BPA. The chemical is especially likely to leach out of plastic when it is heated, such as when a baby bottle is warmed in the microwave, thereby allowing the BPA to be ingested and enter the bloodstream. On any given day, several times a day, a baby might drink liquid formula that was sold in a can lined with BPA and then warmed in a plastic baby bottle containing BPA. A small 2013 study of low-income and ethnically diverse pregnant women found BPA in the cord blood of all the women, and one-third had BPA levels that have been found to be “high-risk” in animals. If additional research confirms this finding, low-income children may be especially likely to be exposed to high levels of BPA while in the womb and that could potentially cause learning or behavioral problems.
If BPA is in so many different items that we use every day, it must have been proven safe, right? Unfortunately not. BPA was developed as a synthetic estrogen, and it mimics and interferes with the action of that hormone, which helps regulate development and reproduction. It is called an “endocrine disruptor” because it affects the body’s own hormones (its endocrine system) in ways that could be potentially harmful.
It is difficult to determine just how much BPA, or how much of any hormone-disrupting chemical, is unsafe. Toxicologists test chemicals at very high doses in animals to see if they die or if their health is harmed. After establishing the dangerous dose, much lower doses are then allowed in products used or consumed by humans. These products are labeled safe, despite the fact that the chemicals in them have rarely been tested at low doses in animals, and were never tested in humans at all. Furthermore, recent research shows a paradoxical phenomenon with BPA and other chemicals that affect the endocrine system: their impact on health is sometimes greater at low doses than at high doses.
While early concerns about BPA’s health effects were based primarily on animal studies and research on cells, there is increasing evidence from studies in humans that BPA can cause serious harm, such as increased risk of heart disease, diabetes, obesity, sexual dysfunction, and behavior problems in children.     
Studying the Effects of BPA in Animals
Before studies were conducted on humans, dozens of studies were conducted and are still being conducted in the lab. The American Chemical Society, the national professional association for chemists, reported that 153 government-funded BPA experiments on lab animals and tissues found harmful effects while only 14 did not.
BPA experiments on rats linked the chemical to precancerous lesions in the prostate and mammary glands, and to early puberty in females at BPA dosages similar to human exposures, according to a 2008 report on BPA by the National Institutes of Health’s National Toxicology Program. Another study on rats showed that exposure to BPA, as well as exposure to fungicides and pesticides, appears to cause ovarian cysts and fewer eggs in offspring—as many as three generations down the line (a rat’s great “grandchildren”).
Studies of mice exposed to BPA in the womb found that these mice tended to put on more body fat after birth.   However, as adults the BPA-exposed mice were the same size and weight as mice that were not exposed to BPA in the womb. A more recent study, published in 2012, found that adult mice given low doses of BPA twice a day for eight days did not gain weight, but they did develop problems with their metabolism that would lead to type 2 diabetes.
Studies have linked the hormonal effects of BPA from canned cat food to the epidemic of hyperthyroidism in cats, especially females. Studies of rats and mice have linked BPA to hyperactivity and various brain and behavioral changes, including increased anxiety and impaired cognition.    In 2008, the first study of nonhuman primates found that BPA levels were associated with cognitive problems that could affect learning and memory.
The National Toxicology Program’s 2008 report recommended that more studies be conducted on BPA’s health effects on humans, and the report stated: “The possibility that bisphenol A may alter human development cannot be dismissed.”
Studying How BPA Affects Humans
Since 2008, studies of humans have added greatly to concerns about the health risks of BPA. A major study published in January 2010, based on a major government data set (the NHANES), found that adults with higher levels of BPA in their urine were more likely to have heart disease, even when other variables were statistically controlled. The NHANES data also showed a separate link between levels of BPA in urine and high blood pressure, a major contributor to heart disease. These findings were similar to a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2008, which found a link between BPA levels and diabetes and heart disease, even when obesity was statistically controlled. A study published in Circulation in 2012 based on research in the UK supported these findings. At least two other articles published in 2012 conclude that BPA exposure puts humans at risk for metabolic disorders and obesity.  One of the articles (a review) focused on in utero exposure to BPA, which Dr. Frederick vom Saal and his co-authors say appears to program the fetus to develop into an overweight adult.
As a weak estrogen, BPA has been shown to cause pre-cancerous growths in the mammary glands of rodents, so an important question is whether it could increase a woman’s chances of developing breast cancer, since breast cancer can feed on estrogen. Laboratory studies where scientists look at cells taken from the body suggest that BPA may cause breast cells to change and become cancerous. Not only does regular BPA exposure potentially increase a woman’s chances of developing breast cancer, but it appears to also interfere with chemotherapy for breast cancer patients, possibly reducing its efficacy. 
There is also evidence of harm to fertility and sexual activity. In one study, men who were exposed to very high levels of BPA at work were four times as likely to experience erectile dysfunction and reduced sexual desire compared to men who did not work with BPA. BPA-exposed workers were also seven times as likely to have problems with ejaculation. Although the men in that study had much higher levels of BPA exposure than the average man, this study demonstrates BPA’s potential to harm men’s sexual and reproductive health at high levels and it raises questions about lower levels of exposure. Research is needed to study the effects of more typical BPA exposures (non-occupational exposures) on men’s sexual health.
BPA can also affect a woman’s fertility and has been linked to miscarriages. Studies have shown that women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) who have higher levels of BPA have more difficulty becoming pregnant due to the lower quality of their eggs, fewer fertilized eggs, and reduced levels of estrogen.  
Recent research links prenatal and early childhood BPA exposure to mildly increased anxiety, depression, hyperactivity, and aggression in children.      However, the extent to which BPA seems to affect behaviors varies in different studies, potentially due to differences in how long the child was exposed to BPA, age of the child when exposed or when behavior was examined, the child’s sex, and family factors such as parents’ education levels. Better studies are needed to clarify to what extent BPA exposure affects behavior.
The FDA Drags its Feet as Other Countries Take Action
After a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) analysis concluded that BPA was safe in 2008, the FDA Science Board, which consists of independent scientists who do not work for the FDA, recommended in October 2008 that the FDA analyze the research literature again, relying less on two industry-funded studies of rats and taking into account the best independent studies. It also recommended that new research be conducted to examine BPA safety concerns.
Meanwhile, Canada announced in 2008 that it intended to reduce infant and newborn exposure to BPA by banning its use in baby bottles, setting stringent standards for the amount of BPA allowed to migrate from the can into infant formula, and working with industry to develop alternative food packaging. In October 2010, Canada became the first government in the world to add BPA to its list of toxic substances, in preparation for regulating its use. France and Denmark joined Canada in banning BPA from baby bottles in 2010, and the European Commission voted that same year to ban European Union countries from making and selling baby bottles with BPA, beginning in 2011. In December 2012, the French parliament voted to ban BPA from all baby food packaging in 2013 and from all food containers in 2015.
In January 2010, the FDA announced that its National Center for Toxicological Research in cooperation with the National Toxicology Program is “carrying out in-depth studies to answer key questions and clarify uncertainties about the risks of BPA.” The FDA said that it “shares the perspective of the National Toxicology Program that recent studies provide reason for some concern about the potential effects of BPA on the brain, behavior, and prostate gland of fetuses, infants and children.” The FDA also recognized “substantial uncertainties” with the interpretation of BPA studies and how BPA may affect human health. Despite those uncertainties, the FDA said it supported “a more robust regulatory framework for oversight of BPA to be able to respond quickly, if necessary, to protect the public.” However, the agency said at that time that it was “not recommending that families change the use of infant formula for foods, as the benefit of a stable source of good nutrition outweighs the potential risk of BPA exposure.”
In March 2012, the FDA finally responded to a 2008 petition from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The petition had asked the FDA to ban BPA’s use in food and beverage packaging, based on the studies at the time. After ignoring NRDC’s petition for years, the FDA—under pressure of a law suit—responded that there was insufficient evidence to remove the chemical from the products in which it is currently being used, and that the Agency would continue to review studies of BPA. It is important to note that the FDA’s rejection of the petition was based on the studies that the NRDC had submitted with the petition in 2008, not on the more recent studies.
Legislation to Ban BPA in the U.S.
In March 2009, Suffolk County in New York became the first county in the U.S. to ban BPA in baby bottles and “sippy” cups, and in May of 2009, Chicago and Minnesota followed.    Also in 2009, Connecticut passed a law banning BPA in children’s reusable bottles and cups as well as infant formula and baby food containers, which went into effect in October 2012. Between 2009 and 2013, 12 states and the District of Columbia have passed bans on BPA in either infant formula containers or other food-related products for children. By July 2013, the industry had stopped using BPA-based packaging for infant formula. It was not until the industry had voluntarily stopped using BPA that the FDA amended its rules to prevent BPA from use in these packages. 
Members of the U.S. Congress have introduced BPA-related legislation since 2009 without success. In the Spring of 2015, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced a bill in the Senate (S. 821) that would require any food packaging that contains BPA to state “This food packaging contains BPA, an endocrine-disrupting chemical, according to the National Institutes of Health.” 
BPA in Plastics
BPA is found in polycarbonate (PC) plastics, which are typically clear and hard, marked with the recycle symbol “7” or may contain the letters “PC” near the recycle symbol.  To avoid the risks of baby bottles with BPA or other questionable chemicals, look for packages that say “BPA-free” and also consider alternatives such as glass bottles. And to avoid warming up food in plastic containers with these chemicals, use only stoneware, china, or glass dishes and containers in your microwave.
In 2008, manufacturers such as Playtex and Nalgene and retailers such as Wal-Mart pledged to remove BPA from their products and stores by the end of the year.  In March 2009, the six major manufacturers of baby bottles in the United States announced that they would no longer sell baby bottles made with BPA in the U.S. A few days later, SUNOCO, a BPA manufacturer, announced that it would require companies using BPA in their products to confirm that none of those products would be used to hold food or water for children under 3 years of age. These voluntary efforts were a result of negative publicity and consumer concerns about BPA.
BPA in Cans
BPA is still in most canned food and beverages sold to people and pets in the U.S. and other countries. Some companies are not waiting for a ban and are voluntarily removing BPA from their food packaging. Eden Foods began using BPA-free cans in 1999 and now uses BPA-free cans for everything except highly acidic tomato products. According to Eden, it costs the company $300,000 more a year to produce BPA-free cans, which are 14% more expensive than industry standard cans; this translates into about 2 cents more per can. Vital Choice introduced new cans and pouches for its fish products at the end of 2008. In 2015, the Environmental Working Group released a market survey of the company reported use of BPA in their cans for 252 food brands. Of the 143 brands from which they were able to obtain information, 31 stated that they used only BPA-free cans (e.g. Health Valley and Tysons) and 78 used cans containing BPA for all products (e.g. Chef Boyardee, Green Giant, Hormel, and Ocean Spray). The rest used BPA-lined cans for some products but not others (e.g.,StarKist, Libby’s, and 365 Everyday Value).
Are any BPA Substitutes Safer than BPA?
In response to new laws, regulations, and consumer concerns about BPA, many products are being made with two new chemicals, bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF). These chemicals were not well studied prior to use, however in the past few years they have been shown to have endocrine disrupting similar effects to BPA in laboratory tests. BPA alternatives also enter the human body just as easily as BPA. This new research suggests that substituting BPA with new compounds that have not been adequately tested for safety is unlikely to provide any health benefits. What is needed is to test the safety of potential BPA substitutes before they can be sold.
Individual Efforts to Reduce Exposure to BPA
While we wait for more research to be conducted, is it possible to avoid BPA and substitutes that may be just as worrisome? A recent study suggests that we can significantly lower our levels of BPA by strictly avoiding many packaged foods and beverages and also changing how we prepare and store food.
In 2012, Ruthann Rudel from the Silent Spring Institute and her co-authors published a study showing how BPA levels in the body are affected by consuming foods and beverages that have come into contact with BPA. Twenty participants in 5 families switched from their normal diet, including canned and packaged items, to a diet consisting of only fresh, unprocessed foods for 3 days. Their BPA levels were tested before the switch, during the 3 days of BPA-free eating and drinking, and again after they had returned to their normal diet. The researchers found that BPA levels went down significantly when people ate foods and drank beverages that had never spent time in cans, plastic bottles, or plastic food storage containers made with BPA and had never come into contact with plastic or nonstick pans during preparation or while eating.
All articles are reviewed and approved by Dr. Diana Zuckerman and other senior staff.
- Hileman, B “Bisphenol A on Trial.” Chemical & Engineering News Government & Policy, 2007; 85(16). Retrieved April 3, 2009 from http://pubs.acs.org/cen/government/85/8516gov2.html
- “NTP-CEHR Monograph on the Potential Human Reproductive and Developmental Effects of Bisphenol A.” National Toxicology Program. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Sept. 2008. Web.3 Apr. 2009.
- Gerona RR, Woodruff TJ, Dickenson CA, Pan J, Schwartz JM, Sen S, Friesen M, Fujimoto VY, & Hunt PA. BPA, BPA glucuronide, and BPA sulfate in mid-gestation umbilical cord serum in a northern California cohort. Environmental Science and Technology, 2013: web version. doi: 10.1021/es402764d
- Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Calafat AM, Yolton K, Ye X, Dietrich KN, & Lanphear BP. Impact of early-life Bisphenol A exposure on behavior and executive function in children. Pediatrics 2011: 128; 873-882. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1335
- Schierow, L. and Lister, S.A. “Bisphenol A (BPA) in Plastics and Possible Human Health Effects.” May 2008. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, The Library of Congress.
- Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, et al. “Hormones and Endocrine-disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses.” Endocrine Reviews. March 2012. Web.16 Apr. 2012.
- Melzer, D., Rice, N.E., Lewis, C., Henley, W.E., and Galloway, T.S. “Association of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration with Heart Disease: Evidence from NHANES 2003/06.” PLoS ONE2012; 5(1). Web. Retrieved January 13, 2010 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008673
- Lang, I.A., Galloway, T.S., Scarlett, A., et al. “ Association of Urinary Bisphenol A Concentration With Medical Disorders and Laboratory Abnormalities in Adults.” Journal of American Medical Association 2008; 300(11): 1303-1310.
- Vom Saal FS, Nagel SC, Coe BL, Angle BM, Taylor JA. The estrogenic endocrine disrupting chemical bisphenol A (BPA) and obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012 May 6;354(1-2):74-84. Epub 2012 Jan 10
- Li, D., Zhou, Z, Qing, D., et al. “Occupational Exposure to Bisphenol-A (BPA) and the Risk of Self-Reported Male Sexual Dysfunction.” Human Reproduction. Web. 2009 November 10.
- Findlay LC, Kohen DE. “Bisphenol A and child and youth behaviour: Canadian Health Measures Survey 2007 to 2011.” Health Reports. Aug, 2015. 26(8): 3-9.
- Nilsson E, Larsen G, Manikkam M, Guerrero-Bosagna C, Savenkova MI, Skinner MK. “Environmentally Induced Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance of Ovarian Disease.” Plos One 2012; 7(5): e36129. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036129
- Somm E, Schwitzgebel VM, Toulotte A, Cederroth CR, Combescure C, Nef S, Aubert ML, Hüppi PS. Perinatal exposure to bisphenol a alters early adipogenesis in the rat. Environ Health Perspect.2009 Oct;117(10):1549-55.
- Ryan KK, Haller AM, Sorrell JE, Woods SC, Jandacek RJ, Seeley RJ; Perinatal exposure to bisphenol-a and the development of metabolic syndrome in CD-1 mice. Endocrinology. 2010, 151(6):2603-12.
- Batista TM, onso-Magdalena P, Vieira E, Amaral ME, Cederroth CR, Nef S, Quesada I, Carneiro EM, Nadal A. 2012. Short-term treatment with bisphenol-a leads to metabolic abnormalities in adult male mice. PLoS.One. 7(3):e33814. PM:22470480.
- Edinboro, C.H., Scott-Moncrieff, C., Janovitz, E., Thacker, H.L., and Glickman, L.T. “Epidemiologic study of relationships between consumption of commercial canned food and risk of hyperthyroidism in cats.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2004; 224(6): 879-886.
- Ishido M, Masuo Y, Kunimoto M, Oka S, Morita M (2004) Bisphenol A Causes Hyperactivity In The Rat Concomitantly With Impairment Of Tyrosine Hydroxylase Immunoreactivity.” Journal of Neuroscience Research,76:423-433
- Tian YH, Baek JH, Lee SY, Jang CG (2010) Prenatal and postnatal exposure to bisphenol a induces anxiolytic behaviors and cognitive deficits in mice. Synapse 64: 432–439
- Ryan BC, Vandenbergh JG (2006) Developmental exposure to environmental estrogens alters anxiety and spatial memory in female mice. Horm Behav 50: 85–93.
- Xu XH, Zhang J, Wang YM, Ye YP, Luo QQ (2010) Perinatal exposure to bisphenol-A impairs learning-memory by concomitant down-regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors of hippocampus in male offspring mice. Hormones and behavior 58: 326–333.
- Leranth, C., Hajszan, T., Szigeti-Buck, K., Bober, J., and Maclusky, N.J. “Bisphenol A prevents the synaptogenic response to estradiol in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of ovariectomized nonhuman primates.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. PNAS, 2008; 105(37): 14187-14191.
- Shankar A, Teppala S. Urinary bisphenol A and hypertension in a multiethnic sample of US adults. J Environ Public Health 2012:48164. Web. 2012 Jan 27.
- Melzer D, et.al. “Urinary Bisphenol: A Concentration and Risk of Future Coronary Artery Disease in Apparently Healthy Men and Women.” Circulation 2012 Mar 27;125(12):1482-90.
- Soriano S, Alonso-Magdalena P, García-Arévalo M, Novials A, Muhammed SJ, et al. (2012) Rapid Insulinotropic Action of Low Doses of Bisphenol-A on Mouse and Human Islets of Langerhans: Role of Estrogen Receptor β. PLoSONE 7(2): e31109. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031109
- Goodson WH 3rd, Luciani MG, Sayeed SA, et.al. “Activation of the mTOR pathway by low levels of xenoestrogens in breast epithelial cells from high-risk women.” Carcinogenesis. 2011 Nov;32(11):1724-33.
- Barrett J.R. “Trumped Treatment?: BPA Blocks Effects of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Drugs.” Environ Health Perspect 2009; 117:A75-A75.
- LaPensee EW, Ben-Jonathan N. “Novel roles of prolactin and estrogens in breast cancer: resistance to chemotherapy.” Endocr Relat Cancer 2010 Feb 25;17(2):R91-107.
- Fujimoto VY, Kim D, vom Saal FS, Lamb JD, Taylor JA, Bloom MS. “Serum unconjugated bisphenol A concentrations in women may adversely influence oocyte quality during in vitro fertilization.” Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr; 95(5):1816-9.
- Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Sonta S, Makino T, Suzumori K. “Exposure to bisphenol A is associated with recurrent miscarriage.” Hum Reprod. 2005 Aug; 20(8): 2325-9.
- Mok-Lin E, Ehrlich S, Williams PL, Petrozza J, Wright DL, Calafat AM, Ye X, Hauser R. “Urinary bisphenol A concentrations and ovarian response among women undergoing IVF.” Int J Androl. 2010 Apr;33(2):385-93.
- Bloom MS, Kim D, Vom Saal FS, Taylor JA, Cheng G, Lamb JD, Fujimoto VY. “Bisphenol A exposure reduces the estradiol response to gonadotropin stimulation during in vitro fertilization.”Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep; 96(3):672-677.
- Ehrlich S, Williams PL, Missmer SA, Flaws JA, Berry KF, Calafat AM, Ye X, Petrozza JC, Wright D, Hauser R. “Urinary Bisphenol A Concentrations and Implantation Failure among Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization.” Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Apr 6. Web.
- Evans SF, Kobrosly RW, Barrett ES, Thurston SW, Calafat, AM, Weiss B, Stahlhut R, Yolton K, Swan SH. “Prenatal Bishpeol A Exposure and maternally reported behavior in boys and girls.” Neurotoxicology. 2014 Dec; 45: 91-99.
- Harley KG, Gunier RB, Kogut K, Johnson C, Bradman A, Calafat AM, Eskenazi B. “Prenatal and early childhood Bisphenol A concentrations and behavior in school-aged children.” Environ Res. Oct, 2013; 126: 43-50.
- Perera F, Vishnevetsky J, Herbstman JB, Calafat AM, Xiong W, Rauh V Want S. “Prenatal Bisphenol A exposure an child behavior in an inner-city cohort.” Environ Health Perspect. Aug, 2012; 120(8): 1190-1194.
- “Government of Canada Takes Action on Another Chemical of Concern: Bisphenol A.” Health Canada. April 18, 2008. Web. April 3, 2009. http://www.ecoaction.gc.ca/news-nouvelles/20080418-5-eng.cfm
- Reuters. Canada declares BPA toxic, sets stage for more bans. October 14, 2012.http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/10/14/us-bpa-idUSTRE69D4MT20101014
- USA Today.Europe votes to ban chemical from baby bottles. Updated November 29, 2012.
- Agence France Presse. France bans contested chemical BPA in food packaging. December 13, 2012.
- “Update on Bisphenol A for Use in Food Contract Applications.” U.S. Food and Drug Administration. January 2010. Web. May 4, 2010, http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/ucm197739.htm
- “FDA Rejects NRDC Call to Eliminate BPA from Food Packaging.” Natural Resources Defense Council. March 30 2012. Web. Apr. 6 2012.
- Kindall J. “Suffolk’s Ban on BPA Hailed in Some Quarters.” The New York Times. March 13, 2009. Web. May 4, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/nyregion/long-island/15cupsli.html
- Hawthorne M, Mihalopoulos D. “Chicago BPA ban: Chicago bans sale of baby bottles, sippy cups with dangerous chemical.” Chicago Tribune. May 14 2009. Web. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-05-14/news/0905131100_1_baby-bottles-ban-sippy-cups.
- Von Sternberg B. (8, May 2009). “State bans chemicals in baby bottles: Bisphenol-A is found in many plastics, but Minnesota becomes the first state to outlaw sale of items containing it.” Start Tribune. May 8, 2009. Web.
- State of Connecticut. “An Act Concerning Banning Bispehnol-A in Children’s Products and Food Products.” Substitute House Bill No.6572. June 3, 2009. Web. http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/ACT/PA/2009PA-00103-R00HB-06572-PA.html
- National Conference of State Legislatures. “NCSL policy update: state restrictions on bisphenol a (BPA) in consumer products.” Feb 2015. Web. http://www.ncsl.org/research/environment-and-natural-resources/policy-update-on-state-restrictions-on-bisphenol-a.aspx#me
- US Food and Drug Administration. “FDA Regulations No Longer Authorize the Use of BPA in Infant Formula Packaging Based on Abandonment; Decision Not Based on Safety.” July 11, 2013. Web. http://www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/ConstituentUpdates/ucm360147.htm
- US Congress. “S.821 – BPA in Food Packaging Right to Know Act.” Web Jan 14, 2016. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/821
- Parker-Pope, T. “A Hard Plastic is Raising Hard Questions.” The New York Times. April 22, 2008. Web. April 3, 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/22/health/22well.html
- Gunther, M. “Wal-Mart: the new FDA.” Fortune Magazine. July 16, 2008. Web. http://archive.fortune.com/2008/07/15/magazines/fortune/gunther_bpa.fortune/index.htm
- Layton, L. “No BPA for Baby Bottles in U.S.” The Washington Post. March 6, 2009. Web. April 3, 2009 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/05/AR2009030503285.html
- Rust S, Kissinger M. “Maker acknowledges BPA worries.” JSOnline. Milwaukee Wisconsin Journal Sentinel. March 12, 2009. Web. April 3, 2009 http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/41186522.html
- Eden Foods. “Eden Foods Bisphenol-A (BPA) Free Pioneer.” Web. January 2016 http://www.edenfoods.com/articles/view.php?articles_id=178
- Deardoff J. “Where to find BPA free cans.” Julie’s Health Club. June 30, 2008. Web. April 6, 2009 http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/features_julieshealthclub/2008/06/where-to-find-b.html
- “Vital Choice Goes BPA-Free.” Vital Choice Newsletter. Dec. 29, 2008. Web. April 6, 2009.
- Environmental Working Group. “BPA in Canned Food.” Web. June 3, 2015. http://www.ewg.org/research/bpa-canned-food.
- Rochester JR, Bolden AL. Bisphenol S and F: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the Hormonal Activity of Bisphenol A Substitutes. Environmental Health Perspectives. July 2015; 123(7):643-650.
- National Conference of State Legislatures. “NCSL policy update: state restrictions on bisphenol a (BPA) in consumer products.” Feb 2015. Web. http://www.ncsl.org/research/environment-and-natural-resources/policy-update-on-state-restrictions-on-bisphenol-a.aspx#me
- Rudel RA, Gray JM, Engel CL, Rawsthorne TW, Dodson RE, et al. “2011 Food Packaging and Bisphenol A and Bis(2-Ethyhexyl) Phthalate Exposure: Findings from a Dietary Intervention.” Environ Health Perspect March 30, 2011; 119(7).