NCHR Written Testimony in Support of HB457 for the Maryland House of Delegates Environment and Transportation Committee

February 16, 2024: NCHR provides written testimony to the Maryland House of Delegates Environment and Transportation Committee to support HB457, which requires transparency regarding all new artificial turf and infill installation, use, reuse, recycling, and disposal. This information would enable communities to make informed decisions about artificial turf that take into account how long it lasts and its impact on the environment.

Read More »

NCHR Agrees with CDC Draft Recommendation to Remove Liraglutide and Pertuzumab from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings List

February 15th, 2024: NCHR supports the CDC recommendation to remove Liraglutide and Pertuzumab drugs from the NIOSH List of Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. We agree that due to the to the drugs’ low bioavailability and limited risk of occupational exposures these drugs are unlikely to pose a harm to healthcare workers.

Read More »

NCHR’s Comment on EPA’s Proposed Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI)

February 2024: In its public comment, NCHR supported EPA’s proposed lead and copper rule improvements (LCRI) and suggested strengthening safeguards such as lowering the action lead level to 5 ppb or less, more attention to schools, daycares, and afterschool facilities, better enforcement, and not replacing lead pipes with PVC or other dangerous pipes.

Read More »

NCHR Public Comment on Communications From Firms to Healthcare Providers Regarding Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of Approved Medical Products

December 26, 2023: We responded to the FDA’s request for public comment about the scientific information (SIUU) that firms can provide to healthcare providers about the unapproved uses of approved medical products. Promotion for unapproved (off label) uses were prohibited years ago, but that has been loosened over the decades and the FDA’s new draft guidance is worrisome because it is not as specific as it should be about how to ensure that the information the companies provide is accurate and not misleading. We agree with some of the guidance but urge more careful wording to ban the use of poor quality data and misinterpretation.

Read More »