NCHR submitted the only comment to CPSC about their proposed study of young children’s effective use of smart toys. CPSC responded to our previous comment and released a revised request for public comments, clarifying that the study was exploratory. We responded by again urging CPSC to study a larger number of children who are more representative of the U.S. population, to better guide future guidelines for these toys.
Read More »We’re Speaking Out on Health Issues
NCHR scientists and health policy experts provide written and oral statements on a wide range of topics.
Here are many of the ways we have been Speaking Out on Health Policy Issues for the last few years. Whether the topic is legislation intended to cure diseases, proposed bans on BPA or other chemicals that disrupt your hormones, the importance of including women, people of color, and patients over 65 in clinical trials, or many other topics, you’ll gain a better understanding of our evidence-based analyses by reading these letters, statements, and testimony.
Here are the ways we have been Speaking out on Medical Treatments and Products, such as prescription drugs and medical devices that the FDA is considering approving, or is considering taking off the market because of serious risks. Whether the topic is Chantix, Addyi, Yaz, Essure, or medical products you’ve never heard of, you can find out more about what is known and not known about the safety and effectiveness of a wide range of products by looking through this section of our website.
NCHR’s Comments on the CPSC’s Proposed Guidelines on Safety Standard for Infant and Infant/Toddler Rockers
NCHR supports the CPSC’s new proposed guidelines for infant rockers that will help to strengthen safety standards for such products. We offered suggestions to the rule, including adding a minimum age of use of at least 4 months old, more strongly discouraging the use of rockers for sleeping, and making physical changes that minimize the use for sleeping and the risk of injury. We also urged the CPSC to strengthen warning/labeling requirements, prevent stockpiling of rockers that don’t meet the new requirements, and support future research into the safety of rockers and related products.
Read More »NCHR Public Comment on Communications From Firms to Healthcare Providers Regarding Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of Approved Medical Products
December 26, 2023: We responded to the FDA’s request for public comment about the scientific information (SIUU) that firms can provide to healthcare providers about the unapproved uses of approved medical products. Promotion for unapproved (off label) uses were prohibited years ago, but that has been loosened over the decades and the FDA’s new draft guidance is worrisome because it is not as specific as it should be about how to ensure that the information the companies provide is accurate and not misleading. We agree with some of the guidance but urge more careful wording to ban the use of poor quality data and misinterpretation.
Read More »NCHR Comments On FDA’s Draft Guidance Regarding the Confirmatory Evidence Needed to Demonstrate A Drug’s Effectiveness
December 18, 2023: NCHR urged the FDA to institute stronger scientific standards to confirm that a new drug is effective, preferably two randomized, double-blind, clinical control trials. Patients deserve drugs that are proven to work, not drugs that possibly work.
Read More »NCHR Comments On the FDA’s Draft Guidance Regarding the Development of Novel Drugs for Diabetic Foot Infections
December 18, 2023: NCHR urges the FDA to oppose using non-inferiority trials as evidence for new antibiotic treatments for diabetic foot infections. FDA defines “non-inferior” to include “slightly worse” but new antibiotic treatments should be better than standard treatments. Otherwise they don’t benefit patients and worsen antimicrobial resistance.
Read More »